HP PHOTOSMART R847
Review of HP PhotoSmart R847 by
PARTE784
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
...Base Premium Connection for HP Photosmart 6221 camera with DC input connector, USB connector, compartment recharge battery connector and A / V 98.1 x 22.5 x 63.3 mm (excluding protrusions) 170 x 61 x 137 mm 0.2 kg (with battery) 0.64 kg As you can see, a characteristic that may seem absurd, but that is very comfortable, is that you do not have small bulges of other devices, which makes compact and easy to store. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: Effective ...
Read review
|
| Photo Quality |
 |
| Range of Features |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Design & Look |
 |
| Value for Money |
 |
|
not rated

9/29/2008
|
HP M537
Review of HP PhotoSmart M537 by
INVITR74
Advantages: CHEAP AND NICE
Disadvantages: NONE
I bought because I found it by 77 euros and wanted a semicompacta very cheap and quite quality and the truth is that he has not disappointed, the quality is very acceptable. Pros: price, 2'5 screen, the menu options streamlined to limit the duration of the batteries, the quality of images in day and macros, the antishake system that does not come out blurry photos (although not Hardware), the anti red eye. Cons: The chassis that is not very hard, ...
Read review
|
| Photo Quality |
 |
| Range of Features |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Design & Look |
 |
| Value for Money |
 |
|
not rated

9/29/2008
|
Good Camera for Beginning Photographers!
Review of HP PhotoSmart M425 by
Fancyface
Advantages: Loads of features, easy to operate.
Disadvantages: Pictures do not upload to computer in order. Memory card sold separately.
I received this camera as a Christmas present from my husband in 2006. He bought it for me because I wanted a digital camera for work. I am a Real Estate agent, and I take a lot of pictures of the houses that I list, and I also make my own virtual tours for the internet.
I do not know exactly why my husband picked this particular camera. However, knowing him, it had something to do with the price. He is not a technological expert, so any information ... ...his head (and mine, too).
For those of you who do understand the technical language, it has 5.0 megapixel resolution, and a 3X optical zoom lens. There is a built in flash, with automatic red eye removal. The effective flash range is 12.5 feet. I do not know if any of this is good, average or bad, but it has satisfied me completely.
The camera has a help menu built in which has been great. It answers many questions you may have and also includes ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
|
| Photo Quality |
 |
| Range of Features |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Design & Look |
 |
| Value for Money |
 |
|
very helpful

6/30/2008
|
Cam acceptances and good performance.
Review of HP PhotoSmart M737 by
eslort745
Advantages: --------------
Disadvantages: -----------------
IN GENERAL A GOOD article. Easy to handle and understand. Acceptance ZOOM digital and analog, and good quality resulting in the pictures. CONNECTION WITH PC. A camera with good performance and ease of use and understand. AN ALTERNATIVE HIGH ZOOM analog and digital pan and zoom these images to be desired. Also has a menu of options well understood and easy to modify or change your options, WHETHER of quality in the image, as in background, colour, ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
| Photo Quality |
 |
| Range of Features |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Design & Look |
 |
| Value for Money |
 |
|
helpful

6/19/2008
|
we will shoot
Review of HP PhotoSmart R742 by
astur457
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
...these thinking about buying an HP Photosmart, specifically this, you say that this very well, is very compact. has very good image quality and not have the viewer pequeño.tiene a 2.5-inch LCD mionitor, this very well for all ojos.el zoom is also a past, it is optical and digital, is included and so is very comfortable to carry anywhere, pockets in a bag, riñonera. You can shoot many times in a row, has a good flash.no brings memory card, that's bad, ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
| Photo Quality |
 |
| Range of Features |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Design & Look |
 |
| Value for Money |
 |
|
helpful

6/26/2008
|